Your state’s pack. New issues arrive periodically on Mondays. Bookmark it. I built this for the Arizona T&E solo who knows the Uniform Probate Code (Arizona’s A.R.S. Title 14) cold but still loses an afternoon a week hunting the current homestead number, the Medicaid (AHCCCS / ALTCS) long-term-care posture, whether the latest State Bar of Arizona ethics guidance changes how you scope an engagement, or whether a recent Arizona Court of Appeals decision just moved the law on capacity, undue influence, or a trustee’s duties. What’s below is what mattered in Arizona lately — the week’s developments and the recent rulings from the bench.
For licensed attorneys. This pack is general legal information and professional commentary for practicing attorneys — it is not legal advice, does not apply to any specific matter, and creates no attorney-client relationship. Verify every authority against the cited primary source before relying on it with a client. Published by Mike Moss, a Utah-admitted attorney, as an AI-enablement information product; it is not an offer of legal services and is not a representation that the author is admitted to practice in your jurisdiction.
Three developments from the last seven days that I think actually matter to a Arizona T&E solo. Each one has a read that lands on your practice specifically — and each one comes with the citation so you can verify the detail yourself before you use it with a client.
Per the session law, Laws 2025, Ch. 88 (HB2657, 57th Leg., 1st Reg. Sess.; approved by the Governor Apr. 18, 2025) amended A.R.S. §§ 14-1201, 14-2302, 14-2402, 14-3716, 14-3718, 14-5101, 14-6102, and 14-10105 — modernizing definitions (including confirming a will may be paper or electronic), omitted-children shares, the homestead allowance, successor/surviving personal-representative powers, guardianship definitions, and nonprobate-transferee liability for creditor claims.
For an Arizona solo, this is a code-level update to pull into your form library now. The headline items are the codified paper-or-electronic will definition — consistent with Arizona’s recognition of electronic wills — and the refined nonprobate-transferee creditor-liability scheme at § 14-6102, which changes how beneficiary-deed and revocable-trust plans interact with creditor claims. Re-check any boilerplate keyed to the amended sections against the new text.
Ariz. Laws 2025, Ch. 88 (HB2657, 57th Leg., 1st Reg. Sess.) · azleg.gov · Laws 2025 Ch. 88
Per AHCCCS, effective January 1, 2026 the Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS) gross monthly income limit is $2,982 for an individual (300% of the Federal Benefit Rate). ALTCS, delivered through AHCCCS, applies both financial and medical eligibility tests; this is the financial-side income figure for the new year.
For an Arizona solo, this is the number to use this year on every long-term-care screen. ALTCS has both a financial and a medical test, so the $2,982 income figure is one gate, not the whole analysis — but a client over it needs a planning vehicle, not a wait-and-see. Update your ALTCS intake worksheet to the 2026 figure so you aren’t screening against last year’s limit.
AHCCCS — ALTCS eligibility (eff. Jan. 1, 2026) · azahcccs.gov · ALTCS
Per azcourts.gov, the Arizona Steering Committee on AI and the Courts (created by Administrative Order 2024-33) issued “Generative AI: Ethical Best Practices for Lawyers and Judges,” and the State Bar of Arizona maintains a standing AI-guidance page for practitioners. Both are live obligations addressing competence, confidentiality, verification, and billing — Arizona is not a no-guidance vacuum.
For an Arizona solo, the practical move is to read both: the court committee’s best-practices document for judicial-facing and practice ethics, and the State Bar’s page for the practitioner how-to. Treat verification of AI output, confidentiality of inputs, and a defensible fee basis as the baseline, and align your AI workflow with the published guidance before it is tested in a matter.
Ariz. Steering Committee on AI and the Courts (Admin. Order 2024-33), Ethical Best Practices · azcourts.gov · AISC guidance
Decisions from the courts that bind an Arizona practitioner — the Arizona Supreme Court and the Arizona Court of Appeals, the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, and the Ninth Circuit — read for what actually changes how you draft, advise, and plan. Trusts and estates broadly, not Medicaid alone: wills and capacity, undue influence, fiduciary duty, trust construction, and estate recovery. One read, the holding, and the official cite.
Across the Arizona appellate courts and the federal courts covering Arizona, no qualifying trusts-and-estates or estate-recovery decision has been verified for this period. Per the lane’s no-invent rule, this row says so plainly rather than inflating a holding. The lane reads each opinion before it lands here, and reads-and-discards Medicaid program/provider litigation as not T&E.
Nothing to re-paper from the bench this period; controlling authority is unchanged.
Awaiting verified weekly signal — CourtListener used for discovery only, never cited as authority.
This slot holds the next significant trusts-and-estates or estate-recovery decision from Arizona’s appellate courts or the federal courts covering Arizona. When the trailing window has no new ruling, this row says so plainly rather than inventing one.
[Per-state “what this means today” paragraph lands here once a ruling is populated — otherwise: nothing to re-paper from the bench this period; controlling authority unchanged.]
Official reporter · court · date — never courtlistener.com
This week in Arizona for the T&E solo with AHCCCS / ALTCS clients: the developments from the State Bar of Arizona (Probate & Trust Law Section) and AHCCCS that actually moved your practice this period — each one primary-source verified.
Bar and Medicaid changes land on different schedules and aren't indexed by practice focus. Every item here was checked against its primary source, with the link, so you can verify before relying on it.